REJOINDER TO THE UNFOUND ALLEGATIONS OF A DESPERATE “CLERGYMAN” VENERABLE OKUNUGA AND HIS SOCIAL MEDIA “PROSECUTION
PROF. YEMI OKE
PhD; LL.M (Osgoode Hall, York University, Canada) LL.B (IIorin); B.L (Abuja).
Department of Jurisprudence and International Law
Faculty of Law, University of Lagos
Akoka, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria
Mobile: +234-802-314-8096; (Land line) +234-7420496
E mail: yemioke@mjs - ca.com, yoke @ unilag. edu.ng
REJOINDER TO THE UNFOUND ALLEGATIONS OF A DESPERATE
“CLERGYMAN” VENERABLE OKUNUGA AND HIS SOCIAL MEDIA
“PROSECUTION”
(1) My attention has been drawn to yet another desperate moves by Venerable
B. O. Okunuga to frustrate my long-held dream, desire and aspiration to
becoming a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) through an on-line document
captioned: “Clergyman Call on LPPC to Disqualify Law Professor from SAN
Rank alleging Fraudulent and Sharp Practices” published on September 23,
2023 by Halima Abiola at: <loyalnigerianlawyer.com>.
(2) I have never met or set my eyes on Venerable Okunuga till date. While I
appreciate the fact that, in line with the tradition of Legal Practitioners
Privileges Committee (LPPC) to invite comments on suitability of applicants,
comments may be made, but certainly gallery-dancing on social media over
a private communication with the LPPC is, to the least cheap and desperate
of Venerable Okunuga.
(3) Venerable Okunuga had earlier submitted the same petition against my
application for SAN on 7th October, 2020. My confirmation had to be put on
hold for the LPPC to thoroughly look into the misplaced allegations.
(4) I appeared before the LPPC in respect of the earlier petition of Venerable
Okunuga. The LLPC ruled that Suit. No. LD/2437LM/2019 filed by Venerable
Okunuga raised an allegation against my person and that my eligibility to
proceed will be put on hold until the suit is finally determined.
(5) I filed an appeal against the decision but my appeal was not successful.
(6) While the case was pending, I made attempts for apply for SAN again in
2021. The LPPC wrote that I will not be eligible to apply until the suit was
determined.
(7) I applied again in the year 2022 in the hope that the suit would have been
determined. I continued to pray to God for victory. The suit, Suit. No.
LD/2437LM/2019 was dismissed in 2022 after names of applicants for SAN
in 2022 had been shortlisted.
(8) I contacted the LPPC through a letter. The LPPC wrote that, unfortunately,
applications and processing for the year 2022 SAN was almost concluded
and that I can only apply for the next edition in 2023.
(9) I applied for the 2023 edition and was shortlisted only for the “Clergyman”
repeat the same malicious petition with minor additions.
(10) The issue of Ogunade Family over Nos. 366 and 368 Muritatala Mohammed
Way dates back to 1991. The Head of the Ogunade Family filed a suit in
2000, before I was called to the Nigerian bar in January 2001. The suit, No.
ID/198/2000 – Prince Ogunade & Ors vs Venerable Okunuga & Ors
has continued till date. Parties are now on appeal.
(11) We became a tenant in No. 366 Muritala Mohammed Way through the
Landlord, Prince Ogunade. We handled some matters for the landlord.
(12) The unfound, malicious allegation of “collusion” with Prince Ogunade simply
because our firm is a Counsel is, to say the least, most wicked.
(13) Ours is a Partnership. I do mostly advisory, research and consultancy. I’m
not the Counsel on record in the matter but the wicked Venerable Okunuga
has mindlessly singled me out because of my aspiration to be made a Senior
Advocate of Nigeria.
(14) If he has criminal allegations against Prince Ogunade or my person, he
knows where to pursue same. I’d refrained from taking out suits against
him for defamation to avoid beclouding the sense of judgement of the LPPC
in respect of his earlier application of 7th October 2020.
(15) There is not truth in the misplaced, wicked and most malicious allegations
of Venerable Okunuga. The Ogunade family and its headship have been
fighting over Nos. 366 and 368 since 1991 being the properties of their
daughter, Late Mrs Morgan (Nee Ogunade). Family dispute over land should
ordinarily not be taken personal against a Counsel.
(16) I’m very sure the LPPC is a fair professional institution and will not allow
the desperate Venerable Okunuga to again “re-litigate” his misplaced
grievances for which I’d been cleared by the LPPC after rigorous scrutiny.
(17) The ethics of the legal profession will not allow me to say or write beyond
debunking the unfound allegations of Venerable Okunuga. His transferred
aggression is misplaced and had better been directed at the Ogunades.
(18) I remain an applicant before the LPPC. I’ll be unable to say or volunteer
further facts or vital documents or exhibits on social media just to show
that the allegations of Venerable Okunuga are baseless.
(19) By rules, if the LPPC deems it necessary, I will be contacted to make a
formal response to Venerable Okunuga’s renewed allegations for the
second time.
(20) In view of the fact that my image and professional reputation is being
unjustly maligned publicly, I have contacted my lawyers to do the needful.
Thank you.
------------------------------------------
Prof. Ganiu Adeyemi Oke, Ph.D, FCArb, FCTI
Comments
Post a Comment